The reasons for the failure of the Zionist regime after 100 days

Currently 100 days have passed since the beginning of the brutal Zionist attacks on the Gaza Strip. There are many reasons for the failure of the Zionist regime in spite of its weapons and material superiority and the resolute support of the West for this regime in 100 days some of which are mentioned:

Currently, 100 days have passed since the beginning of the brutal Zionist attacks on the Gaza Strip. There are many reasons for the failure of the Zionist regime in spite of its weapons and material superiority and the resolute support of the West for this regime in 100 days, some of which are mentioned:

1. The first reason is the political structure of this regime. The formative model of this structure is the United States of America, but with the difference that the principle in the Israeli regime is militarism and security construction. In other words, regime security construction can be defined or understood in a military format. If the change and continuity in such a structure over time find a vertical curve, it will be the beginning of its decline and decay. This situation has been established by the Zionist regime under the leadership of the Eastern Jews and, more precisely, the extreme rightists since 1997, and the emergence of this situation in the first step appeared the gap between the regime and the West regarding the non-continuation of settlements on the one hand and the granting of the right to determine the minimum destiny to the Palestinians on the other hand. At the same time, the formation of the ultra-Jewish state revealed the gap depth of the political structure of this regime in the categories of religious, security, economic extremism, and, most importantly, in the area of the independence of the judiciary. These major weaknesses revealed the turning point of the resistance in the field of conflict with the Zionist regime and promoted the resistance from a defensive shield to the field of preemptive and surprise warfare in the depths of occupied Palestine. Therefore, the initiative was out of the regime's control, and after a week of the Al-Aqsa Storm operation, the full-scale entry of the United States and the capture of the regime's command and think tank, followed by the entry of CENTCOM, NATO, and other western countries, was a convincing proof of the regime's defeat.
2. The second reason is the United States of America as the only strategic partner of the regime in the international arena. However, basically, America explains and consolidates the process of structural change and continuity based on the standard of reasoning derived from the British Anglo-Saxon system. Therefore, the decline of the hegemony of the United States itself is convincing proof of the regime's strategic weakness in the survival and consolidation of its stability and security foundations. The turning point of the United States' decline in the Al-Aqsa Storm operation lies in the extreme weakness of this country in managing the South China Sea crisis and the conflict in Ukraine, Afghanistan, and Iraq at the same time, which practically waives the said cases in order to save the Zionist regime from bankruptcy.
3. The third reason is the accurate understanding of the truth and what is allowed in the Gaza war. The truth of the war is on the southern front of Lebanon, Hezbollah on one side and the front of Yemen on the other. What is happening in Gaza after the Al-Aqsa Storm operation by the American-Zionist axis basically does not reflect the concept of war. The occurrence of these behaviors is a crime against humanity, and its international investigation is formed based on the ICG process with South Africa's pioneer.
4. The fourth reason is the disruption of the traditional threat balance in the international system after the Al-Aqsa Storm. The strategic error of the American-Zionist axis is that they did not overcome this understanding, and their feeling is that victory against a movement and a guerrilla group of 45,000 people without a war machine is not extraordinary. However, asymmetric war does not reflect the balance of traditional threats nor the balance of traditional forces of the international system after the First and Second World Wars, and the only balance in such conflicts is the balance of wills in deterrence, which determines the dominant and defeated sides. The entry of the American-Zionist axis into tactical retreats shows the dominant determination and will of the resistance axis in the conflict with the West and the Zionists. Meanwhile, the emergence of the resistance axis in the style of traditional and modern wars, such as cyber, artificial intelligence, hybrid, and cognitive, and the use of economic warfare is the turning point of the evolution of asymmetric wars of the resistance axis. Now, suppose this process is promoted to the threat of interrupting the data networks of the Red Sea and the Bab al-Mandab strait, or to the development of coordinated and simultaneous multi-frontal resistance action or the connection of Gaza, the West Bank, and the Group 48. In that case, it can lead to the turning point of the destruction of the Zionist regime.

Mojtaba Ferdosipour, Manager of the West Asia and North Africa Study Group

(The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IPIS)