Structure
Structure
president
Research and Studies
Executive and Document
Vice President Education
School of International Relations
Structure
Structure
Events
Events
Recent Events
Archive
Events
Events
Multimedia
Multimedia
Podcasts
Videos
Infographics
pictures
Multimedia
Multimedia
Publications
Books
Books
Magazines
Foreign Policy Quarterly
History of Foreign Relations Quarterly
Central Asia and the Caucasus Studies Quarterly
Publications
Books
Magazines
About Us
History
History
contact us
contact us
About Us
History
contact us
{{ itemData.Title }}
{{ itemData.Title }}
{{ itemData.Title }}
فارسی
عربی
+آ
-آ
T+
T-
English
عربی
Structure
Structure
president
Research and Studies
Executive and Document
Vice President Education
School of International Relations
Structure
Structure
Events
Events
Recent Events
Archive
Events
Events
Multimedia
Multimedia
Podcasts
Videos
Infographics
pictures
Multimedia
Multimedia
Publications
Books
Books
Magazines
Foreign Policy Quarterly
History of Foreign Relations Quarterly
Central Asia and the Caucasus Studies Quarterly
Publications
Books
Magazines
About Us
History
History
contact us
contact us
About Us
History
contact us
{{ itemData.Title }}
{{ itemData.Title }}
{{ itemData.Title }}
جستجو
Sajjad Atazade
Chinese International Relations Theories in the Framework of “Global International Relations”: From Critique of Western-centrism to Rethinking World O
Since its inception the discipline of International Relations (IR) has been marked by a fundamental tension: on the one hand the claim to explain “global politics” through universally valid theories on the other a deep reliance on Western—particularly European and American—historical experiences epistemological assumptions and normative priorities. Amitav Acharya former president of the International Studies Association (ISA) places this tension at the center of theoretical debate through his concept of Global IR.
یکشنبه ۲۶ بهمن ۱۴۰۴
Foreign Policy of Donald Trump: Power-centric Nationalism in the Era of Declining Liberal Order
The rise of Donald Trump in U.S. foreign policy cannot be reduced simply to a miscalculation by partisan elites or the temporary dissatisfaction of the middle class. Trump’s foreign policy reflects an accumulated crisis of U.S. hegemony and a deep gap between America’s material capabilities and its extensive commitments in the international order. From this perspective Trump’s foreign policy is not a “deviation from the norm” but an alternative formulation of American power under conditions of relative decline.
دوشنبه ۲۷ بهمن ۱۴۰۴